April 4, 2008

Shoulder Dystocia Verdict in Missouri

Missouri Lawyers Weekly reports on a recent medical malpractice defense verdict after an 8 day trial in Buchanan County, Missouri in favor of an obstetrician and nurse involving a difficult deliver almost 12 years ago.

Shoulder dystocia can result from a difficult childbirth where the baby’s head is able to clear but the shoulders - typically one shoulder - will not come out. Not surprisingly, this problem develops with larger babies.

The doctor in this case argued that he used fundal pressure and forceps to clear the shoulder. Defendants further claimed there was no shoulder dystocia and any complications the baby had must have occurred in utero (I’m assuming the last part).

Interestingly, the Plaintiffs videotaped the delivery which I imagine gave the jury a far better idea as to how the delivery went then you would see in most cases.

Shoulder dystocia cases typically are not, thankfully, medical malpractice cases because the injuries tend to resolve. When they do not, the child may suffer permanent brachial plexus injury or mental impairment. Whether shoulder dystocia is caused by medical malpractice of the delivering doctor depends on the facts of the specific case.

April 3, 2008

Missouri Medical Malpractice Verdict in Jackson County

According to an article in Missouri Lawyers Weekly, a Jackson County jury recently found for the defendant doctors in a medical malpractice claim for failure to diagnose Plaintiff’s appendicitis, causing the appendix to perforate, leading to peritonitis. Fortunately for the Plaintiff, she had already received a settlement from other doctors who have provided care to her from this incident. At trial, the defendant doctors pointed to the empty chair defendants.

It might have made sense to settle out with the other defendants in this case. We don’t know what the numbers were. But a trial is a search for blame and it is always easier for a jury to blame someone who is not in the room.

February 11, 2008

Average Jury Verdicts in Kansas City

The Kansas City Star reported last month that the average plaintiffs' verdicts in the Kansas City metro area last year averaged nearly $1.3 million, nearly double the 2006 average of $688,337.

Does this mean that Kansas City juries have become remarkably more liberal? No. Now is the time to dust off all of those “you can prove anything with statistics” clichés.

Average verdicts are always misleading because they involve highs that completely distort the average which is why most statistical analysis of jury verdicts uses the median verdict not the average jury verdicts.

The Kansas City had three big verdicts that make the average misleading: (1) Sprint’s $69.5 million verdict against Vonage Holdings in a patent dispute; (2) a $20 million award to a student injured in a diving accident; and a $17.3 million verdict against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. in a class-action lawsuit over the sale of aftermarket auto parts.

These verdicts themselves are misleading to the extent that insurance companies want to claim this is evidence of juries run amok. The patent case involved a big business dispute where were, as they often are, high. In the diving accident case, the jury found the plaintiff was 20% responsible for his own injuries reducing to $16 million. It is also worth nothing that the plaintiff is a quadriplegic and most of the damages will go towards the medical bills he will incur for the rest of his life. Accordingly, it was certainly not a runaway jury verdict. The verdict against American Family Insurance was tossed by the trial judge who ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their theory of damages.

December 21, 2007

Welcome to Our Blog

Welcome to our blog covering injury law and policy throughout the United States.