Monday's Food Recalls....

October 31, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.


This week may prove to be a busy one, with four recalls announced first thing this morning.

The holiday season usually brings tins of butter cookies, but not for Rite Aid. Rite Aid has initiated a voluntary chainwide recall of approximately 85,000 tins of butter cookies, distributed by Rite Aid under the Rich Fields brand name, due to the possibility that they may be contaminated with Bacillus cereus. This microorganism may cause diarrhea, nausea and/or vomiting; however, the possibility of serious adverse health consequences is minimal.

This recall affects only the 12 oz. tins that feature either a decorative castle or Christmas designs, and sold exclusively in Rite Aid stores. Affected butter cookies can be identified by the UPC codes 01249596519 and 88411804619. The recall was initiated after the company conducted quality testing on the affected product because of an uncharacteristic odor. No other Rich Fields or Rite Aid brand products are affected by this voluntary recall.

Second recall for the day is Eating Right's Soy Protein Burgers. The packages inadvertently contain Eating Right™ Veggie Burgers, which contain milk. The label does not list milk as an ingredient. People who have allergies to milk run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reactions and should not eat this product. There is no concern for those who are not allergic to milk.

The Soy Protein Burgers were sold nationwide at:

  • Safeway
  • Carrs
  • Dominick’s
  • Genuardi’s
  • Pak ‘N’ Save
  • Randalls
  • Tom Thumb
  • Vons
  • Pavilions

The retail package is a 4-count, 10-ounce carton marked with a UPC Code of 79893 80071 and one of the following lot codes on the side panel of the package: NOV 17 12 WT A or NOV 12 WT B. This product is located in the freezer case. No other Eating Right products or date codes are involved in this recall. Safeway was notified of the situation by a consumer.

Rhythm Superfoods voluntary recall of KOOL RANCH KALE CHIPS is number three for the day. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that approximately 2,700 cases of the Kool Ranch Kale Chips containing cashews were distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of the cashews. Subsequent investigation indicated that the problem was caused by the use of new packaging that failed to declare the cashews.


Continue reading " Monday's Food Recalls.... " »

Rite Aid Butter Cookies Recall

October 30, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Rite Aid has issued a recall for 85,000 tins of butter cookies sold at Rite Aid under the Rich Fields brand name. The recall was preciptiated by concerns these butter cookies were contaminatied with Bacillus cereus, a nasty microorganism than can cause diarrhea, nausea or vomiting.

This recall affects on butter cookies sold with either a decorative castle or Christmas designs. The recall was initiated after Rite Aid noticed these cookies smelled awful, always a good hint.

The recalled product has UPC codes of 01249596519 and 88411804619 which you can find under the bar code on the bottom of each tin of cookies. Customers should not eat the cookies and can return them to any Rite Aid store for a full refund. Rite Aid is doing a cool thing too, calling customers with their bonus cards to tell them about the recall. They deserve credit for this, assuming someone in marketing did not come up with the idea.

Spin Master Agrees to $1.3 Million Dollar Penalty for Aqua Dots Blunder

October 28, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
$1.3 Million - Not just a slap on the wrist

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has announced that Spin Master, Inc. has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1,300,000. The penalty agreement has been accepted provisionally by the Commission (5-0). If you read this blog regularly, you know that a $1.3 million dollar fine from the CPSC is real coin.

This settlement comes after allegations were made that Spin Master knew, but failed to report, a defect and hazard associated with Aqua Dots. It was alleged that Aqua Dots were toxic, and contained a banned hazardous substance. Spin Master failed to report the defect immediately, as required by federal law, despite numerous reports of illnesses. It was only after CPSC received two reports of children who had ingested the product and had fallen into a coma (both later recovered). Two days later, Spin Master and CPSC announced a voluntary recall of approximately 4.2 million units of Aqua Dots. This can fairly be described as pretty awful, right?

Federal law requires manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to report to CPSC immediately (within 24 hours) after obtaining information reasonably supporting the conclusion that a product contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard, creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death, or fails to comply with any consumer product safety rule or any other rule, regulation, standard, or ban enforced by CPSC.

Aqua Dots was a children's craft kit and toy, that consisted of tiny beads of different colors. When sprayed with water, the dots stuck together, allowing children to create various shapes and designs.

While Spin Master did obtain an outside testing company to evaluate the toxicity of the product, the testing was inadequate. The recall announced that children who swallowed the beads could become comatose, develop respiratory depression, and have seizures.

Staff alleges that the chemical composition of Aqua Dots rendered the product a banned hazardous substance, prohibiting the importation and sale of the product. The Aqua Dots beads contained a chemical that the human body will convert to gamma-hydroxy butyrate (GHB), which is also known as the "date-rape" drug. In agreeing to the settlement, Spin Master denies CPSC staff allegations that it knowingly violated the law.

Aqua Dots craft kits were sold nationwide from April 2007 to November 2007, for between $17 and $30. Target and Toys R Us were both correctly criticized when they advertised a sale on Aqua Dots, even though the recall had been announced. Target stated that the circulars were so far into production that they couldn't impact it when the recall was made. Many felt that stores should have sent the circulars back into production to remove the Aqua Dots from appearing on sale.

What you have, throughout this mess, is companies that put profits over people. Will this fine make a difference? Frankly, I doubt it.

Blue Bunny Ice Cream Recall

October 28, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Wells Enterprises is voluntarily recalling a limited number of packages of its Blue Bunny® Personals® ice cream, due to a mispackaging incident.

On a limited number of packages, the lid indicates the product as Blue Bunny Super Chunky Cookie Dough ice cream, while the carton itself indicates the product as Blue Bunny Peanut Butter Panic ice cream. The product contained in the is Super Chunky Cookie Dough. The ingredient statement on the carton does not declare wheat, which is an ingredient in the Super Chunky Cookie Dough product. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to wheat and/or have gluten sensitivities may be at risk from consuming these products.

The mispackaged Blue Bunny ice cream was distributed in 5.5 fl oz. The cartons affected are indicated by Lot Number 10009 “Best Used By” date 10/1/2012, - UPC 0 70640 00463. The lot number and UPC can be found printed on the side of the carton.

The affected product was shipped to the following states: Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Nebraska, North Dakota, Tennessee, Florida, Wisconsin, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Texas.

Wells Enterprises became aware of the packaging error after receiving a report from a store that the lid and cup were for different products. The allergy alert and recall relates only to the above mentioned mispackaged Blue Bunny ice cream. No other Blue Bunny ice cream products are affected.

Wegmans - Recall of Pine Nuts

October 27, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Wegmans Recalls Pine Nuts

Wegmans Food Markets has announced a recall of bulk Turkish Pine Nuts due to possible Salmonella contamination. The recalled Turkish pine nuts were imported from Turkey by Sunrise Commodities.

Wegmans is recalling approximately 5,000 lbs. of Turkish Pine Nuts, sold in the Bulk Foods department of most Wegmans stores in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, and Maryland, due to possibility of being contaminated with Salmonella. The time frame for the sale of these nuts would have been between July 1 and October 18, 2011.

The bulk Turkish Pine Nuts have been linked to an outbreak of illness from Salmonella Enteritidis, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Illness onset is typically 12 to 72 hours after consumption.

This recall only applies to Turkish Pine Nuts sold in bulk. Other pine nuts sold at Wegmans are not affected by this recall.

Landshires Recalls Even More "Nike" Sandwiches

October 27, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Landshire has broadened their recall of Nike sandwiches, in light of continued concerns with Listeria contamination. In addition to the previously recalled Nike All-American Sandwich, for which they have increased the production date recall for, Landshire is now recalling their Nike Super Poor Boy Sandwich.

The following products are now subject to recall:

  • Landshire Nike All- American
  • Landshire Nike Super Poor Boy

The Nike Super Poor Boy Sandwich comes individually wrapped, but may also be sold in a 2 count or 8 count pack.

  • Individually Wrapped: UPC code is 0 9748800001 1
  • 2 count pack Nike Super Poor Boy: UPC code is 0 9748800765 2
  • 8 count pack Nike Super Poor Boy: UPC code is 0 9748800712 6

Earlier this week, we told you that Landshire was recalling their Nike All-American Sandwich, for Listeria concerns. At that time, the recall was for 1,751 cases - the recall has now been increased to 17,305 cases....gee whiz, just a FEW more cases, wouldn't you say? Did they underestimate their concern initially, and feel that less than 1,800 cases would be sufficient? Or, are they going overboard now, in an abundance of caution? I'm not sure which is the case with this company, or these products, but I would really like to think it is the latter.

Unless you are a hermit, you have heard of the cantaloupe/listeria outbreak that has plagued this nation since August. According to an update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a total of 28 people have now died, nationwide, from the Colorado cantaloupe listeria outbreak. Could "going overboard, in an abundance of caution" have helped this situation? Even if it had saved one death, wouldn't it have been worth it? Why wasn't the nation told to throw away their cantaloupe? Did we not think it could get this big? The 28 person death toll moves up from 25 deaths last week, with an additional 133 reported illnesses, all related to the cantaloupe outbreak. How many more to come next week?

Perhaps these companies, ones with recalls of this nature, need to be a little more cautious, and make the recall on a much broader spectrum, so they don't find themselves backpedaling later. It just makes more sense, and if it prevents one illness, or more importantly, one death, isn't it the "less costly" thing to do?

Pradaxa Problems and Real Costs Compared to Coumadin

October 26, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Note: Since we published this blog post a few months ago, our lawyers are now review potential Pradaxa lawsuits. You can contact us at 800-553-8082 or get a free on-line consultation.

Pradaxa is a new prescription blood-thinning medicine that lowers the chance of blood clots forming in your body. Warfarin (Coumadin) has been the gold standard for years as a blood thinner. Coumadin has been available for more than 50 years. An estimated 26.7 million prescriptions for Coumadin were filled in the U.S. in 2006, with use escalating in recent years. It is reported that Coumadin is one of the 20 most widely used drugs in the United States.

That is a big market that brings in a lot of money. What follows from a big market is other pharmaceutical companies chasing that big market and those dollars. Enter Dabigatran, called by the sexier name Pradaxa, manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim, is a more recent blood thinner to emerge in the marketplace, gaining approval from the FDA in October 2010. The medication has been reported to lower the risk of stroke comparable to Coumadin according to the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) study which was used to obtain FDA approval.

Like Coumadin, there is a risk for hemmorhage. Are there more problems with Pradaxa than Coumadin? No one is sure. But here have been a lot of reports of serious and life-threatening bleeding-related adverse events with Pradaxa. Clinical trials show that the risk of bleeding per year of treatment with Pradaxa was 16.6% (one in six patients) when taking 150 mg twice daily and 14.7% (one in 6.8 patients) taking 110 mg twice daily, compared with 18.4% (one in 5.4 patients) for clinical trials the risk of bleeding per year of treatment with dabigatran was 16.6% (one in six patients) when taking 150 mg twice daily and 14.7% (one in 6.8 patients) taking 110 mg twice daily, compared with 18.4% (one in 5.4 patients) for warfarin. This study proves nothing: there is too little data. But it should give Pradaxa users cause for concern that maybe the problems with Pradaxa may be worse than with Coumadin.

Continue reading " Pradaxa Problems and Real Costs Compared to Coumadin " »

Harley Recall

October 25, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Harley-Davidson will recall 250,757 of its touring motorcycles, trikes and models from the 2009 through 2012. What happened to these usually reliable motorcycles? This Harley recall was precipitated by a problem with rear brake-light switch could be damaged by heat from the Harley's exhaust systems. Apparently, excessive heat causes the switch to fail to activate the brake light during braking. A lesser concern is that the break light can also be activated when the brake has not been put on. Now a real big problem: the motorcycle's defect could also result in a brake fluid leak at the switch that could keep the rear brake from working properly. Any of these three problems could cause a motorcycle accident. Harley-Davidson has already attribued one motorcycle accident to this recall.

American Egg Products Recalls Frozen Eggs -

October 25, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

American Egg Products is recalling their frozen egg product, as it may be contaminated with Salmonella. The affected egg product was distributed to Georgia and Florida, and sold to three distributors and food manufacturers.

The product, American Egg Products Frozen Eggs, comes in five pound paper cartons. The Lot # 272-1 is printed across the side of the master case, and the plant number: 272 1 P 1105 is imprinted inside each individual carton. The recall was initiated as a result of a routine sampling, revealed that the finished product contained Salmonella. American Egg Products has stopped distribution of the frozen eggs.

Just yesterday, we reported that Salmonella was being linked to organic eggs, distributed by Larry Schultz Organic Farm. Salmonella is an organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems.

No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this product.


New Medicare Rule

October 24, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Medicare continues to make efforts to try, post Haro v. Sebelius, to make for an easier solution for dealing with Medicare liens. The latest? In very small cases, the types of cases more likely to be handled by injury victims themselves as opposed to personal injury lawyers, Medicare will offer a 25% gross payment alternative to dealing with Medicare on a lien.

It is certainly not the deal of a lifetime by any stretch. More importantly, it is only for cases that do not exceed $5,000. But the option applies in:

  • Cases after November 7, 2011
  • Involve physical injury
  • $5,000 or less
  • The option is selected in a to-be-determined time frame
  • Medicare has yet to make a final demand
  • The beneficiary does not expect to receive future third party injury payments
If these conditions are satisfied, a beneficiary will be able to resolve and satisfy Medicare's lien by paying Medicare 25% of the insurance settlement. While the primary application will now, more than likely, be small soft tissue car accident claims, a successful run might lead to larger scale implementation down the road.

Continue reading " New Medicare Rule " »

Recall of Nike All-American Sandwich

October 24, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
From Tainted Spinach to Tainted Sandwiches
Landshire of St. Louis, Missouri has initiated a voluntary recall of 1,751 cases of the Nike All-American sandwich, as it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria Monocytogenes. The sandwiches were at retail supermarkets, nationwide. The recall was found as a result of routine sampling, taken by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (NCAGR).

The Nike All-American sandwich subject to the recall is the Landshire Nike All-American, a pre-packaged, individually wrapped sandwich. The sandwich weight is 7.25ounces (206grams), with the UPC code: 0 9748801741 5, and a lot number of: 11 237 6. The lot number is printed in black ink on the side or back of the package.

No illness have been reported with this recall, and no other Landshire products are affected by this recall. Consumers who have purchased the Nike All-American are urged to return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Yamaya USA Recalls Masago (Capelin Roe)

October 24, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Yamaya Recalls Masago

Yamaya is recalling Masago (Capelin Roe), as it may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. The Masago (Capelin Roe) was distributed to retail stores in Los Angeles, California; Baltimore, Maryland; Atlanta, Georgia, and Mexico.

The Masago was packed in a 2 lb plastic container with a white label containing Japanese and English writing, and has “Yamaya USA, Inc.” as the brand. The label indicates Masago (Capelin Roe) and the “Item No. 09867” is printed on the box.

The recall was the result of sampling testing of the facility by the FDA, and it was revealed that this Yamaya sushi contained the bacteria. The company has ceased the production and distribution of the Masago (Capelin Roe).

To date, thankfully, there have been no illnesses reported.

Salmonella Illnesses Linked To Organic Eggs

October 24, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Salmonella Illnesses Linked To Organic Eggs
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) are investigating illnesses that have affected at least six people, and are believed to be associated with a recent recall of organic shell eggs. The eggs were contaminated Salmonella Enteritidis, and were traced back by the MDA to Larry Schultz Organic Farm of Owatonna, where testing confirmed the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis. Larry Schultz Organic Farm has issued a voluntary recall of the tainted eggs. Eggs affected by this recall were distributed to restaurants, grocery stores, food wholesalers and foodservice companies in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.

Eggs from Larry Schultz Organic Farm are packaged under the following brand names:

  • Lunds & Byerly’s Organic
  • Kowalski’s Organic
  • Larry Schultz Organic Farm

The eggs are packed in bulk and varying sizes of cartons (6-egg cartons, dozen egg cartons, 18-egg cartons). Cartons bearing Plant Number 0630 or a “Sell by” date are not included in this recall.

The individuals became ill between August 12 and September 24, and have occurred in both children and adults. Three of these people were hospitalized, but have since recovered.

Recall - Nostrilla Nasal Decongestant

October 23, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Recalled for Potential Bacteria

Insight Pharmaceuticals has recalled a single lot, 34,092 bottles, of Nostrilla Nasal Decongestant nasal spray as it has been determined that it may contain the bacteria Burkholderia cepacia.

Burkholderia cepacia may cause serious infections in individuals with a compromised immune system or chronic lung condition, such as cystic fibrosis.

Nostrilla Nasal Decongestant was distributed nationwide through normal retail outlets and pharmacies. The affected product comes in a 1/2 ounce, plastic bottle, with the expiration date of 05/2014 stamped on the side. The recalled lot is #11G075 with the UPC Code 6373673005.

Consumers who purchased Nostrilla Nasal Decongestant are urged to return the product and contact Insight Pharmaceuticals at 1-877-546-9059. Consumers should advised to call their doctor provider if they have experienced any problems that may be related to taking Nostrilla Nasal Decongestant.

Target Frog Costume Recall

October 23, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Target has recalled 3,400 frog costumes from Trick-or-Treaters-to-be. The frog's mask leaves the child short of air. Without proper venilation, the frog mask presents a suffocation hazzard for the child.

These recalled Chinese-made child-sized frog-themed animal masks are green and yellow with red highlights. There are two eye cutouts and a green elastic band with a fastener used to secure the mask at the back of the child’s head. UPC code 06626491474 is printed on a label attached to the mask. These masks, sold exclusively at Target stores throughout the country, were made from August 2011 through September 2011. They sold for a whopping $1.

Obviously, you don't want your kids to use these masks. Consumers should immediately take masks from young children and return the product to any Target store for a full refund. Since you are really not going to do that, I would suggest just cutting up the mask and throwing it out.

For additional information, you can call Target 800.440.0680 between 8:00am and 5:00pm EST Monday through Friday.

Chocolate Flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars

October 23, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Fiber One Chewy Bar Recall
General Mills is voluntarily recalling one day’s production of Chocolate flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars due because of a labeling issue. Product produced on that date may have been packaged incorrectly and may contain ingredients not listed on the box’s ingredient label, including a potential allergen such as peanuts.

An error caused a limited number of properly labeled, individually wrapped Chocolate Peanut Butter flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars to be packaged into 5-count boxes labeled as Chocolate Flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars.

There have been no reports of allergic reactions or illnesses associated with this product, and this recall includes only 5-count boxes of Chocolate Flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars with "Better if Used By 19MAY2012BV" ” printed on the top of the box.

The individually labeled Chocolate Peanut Butter flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars are visibly different from the Chocolate flavor Fiber One 90-Calorie Chewy Bars that are depicted on the incorrect box, and possibly incorrectly packaged.

Spinach - Two Separate Recalls

October 21, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Spinach Recalls

There have been two separate spinach recalls today, due to concerns of Salmonella contamination.

Church Brothers has voluntarily recalled 560 bags of clipped spinach as a precaution, after one bag tested positive for Salmonella during a random sampling. The recalled product was processed on October 6, 2011 and shipped in 2.5 pound, clear bags, to Super King Markets in Los Angeles, California. The bagged spinach affected by this recall was available for sale beginning on October 7, 2011, and is stamped with a “best if used by” date of 10/23/11.

  • Best By Date: 10/23/11
  • Manufacturer Code10/23/2011 A279 47166

The second spinach recall has been issued by Taylor Farms, for their H-E-B Spinach Spring Mix bagged salad product, as well as deli items that use the spinach.

The affected products are as follows:

  • H-E-B Spinach Spring Mix Bagged Salad 0-41220-19752-1 5-oz
  • Chicken Ranch Salad 62440
  • Small Chicken Ranch Salad, UPC Code: 62441
  • Large Garden Salad, UPC Code: 62442
  • Small Garden Salad, UPC Code: 62443
  • Large Chef Salad, UPC Code: 62444
  • Small Chef Salad, UPC Code: 62445
  • Large Garden Salad w/Rotisserie Chicken Salad, UPC Code: 62449
  • Garden Salad with Roasted Turkey, UPC Code: 62450
  • Cobb Salad 6245

Salmonella, as we have written before, is a dangerous organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and others with weakened immune systems. Symptoms can include fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections and arthritis.

There have been no reports of illness to date with either manufactures product.

False Positives for Mammograms - Why?

October 20, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Mammograms - False Positives

If a woman has to receive a false report from a mammography screening, I’m sure most women would prefer it to be a false-positive – well, if caught early enough anyway, BEFORE surgical intervention. A false-negative delays early treatment that is imperative for a positive outcome for those diagnosed with breast cancer.

According to a study published in the October, 18 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, after ten years of annual mammography screening for breast cancer, more than 60 percent of women will receive at least one false-positive recall, and seven to nine percent have been asked to get a biopsy. The study compared the cumulative probability of false-positive results after 10 years of annual or biennial screening mammography. When screening began at 40 years of age, the cumulative probability of receiving at least one false-positive recall and one false-positive biopsy recommendation was 61.3 and 7.0 percent, respectively, for annual screening, and 41.6 and 4.8 percent, respectively, for biennial screening. Similar estimates were obtained when screening started at age 50 years.

Research has shown that false-positive mammograms may affect women's well-being and behavior, as some women who receive false-positive results may be more likely to return for routine screening, or perform breast self-examinations more frequently. Unfortunately, some women who receive false-positive results become anxious and worried, feelings that can be very difficult to overcome.

Mini S'mores Recall - Undeclared Allergens

October 20, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.


Recalled Mini S'mores


Nassau Candy Distributors has announced a recall of their mini s'mores, as it has been determined that they may contain peanuts that are not listed on the label.

People who have an allergy to peanuts run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product; however, for consumers who are not allergic to peanuts, there are no safety concerns with the product.

The item affected by this recall is following is their NANCY ADAMS Classic MINI S‘MORES, in the red & silver box. The recall is for their 5.5 oz. (155g) box, that contains a manufacturing code of either I1119 or I1120 under code, UPC 6 18645 21923 9.

An investigation has revealed that bags of peanut clusters may have been inadvertently packed into boxes of the Nancy Adams Classic S‘Mores.

The product was sold nationwide through retail stores, and all have been notified. The affected product is being removed from the shelves and being discarded. No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.


Lettuce Recalls Continue

October 20, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Lettuce Recalls Continue

Last week the lettuce recall was due to Listeria, this week we have moved on to Salmonella concerns.

Taylor Farms Retail Inc. has issued a precautionary recall of 3,265 cases of various salad blends, as a random test of packaged spinach showed the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella.

The bagged salad products subject to the recall include:

  • Fresh Selections Hearts of Romaine 10 oz. bag 0-11110-91044-8 TFRS277B07OOKR5L Best By 10-18-11
  • Fresh Selections Leafy Romaine 10 oz. bag 0-11110-91046-2 TFRS277B07OOKR5H Best By 10-18-11
  • Fresh Selections Field of Greens 10 oz. bag 0-11110-91042-4 TFRS277B07OOKR5F Best By 10-18-11
  • Fresh Selections Romaine Blend 10 oz. bag 0-11110-91038-7 TFRS277B07OOKR5N Best By 10-18-11
  • HEB Spring Mix 5 oz. bag 0-41220-19752-1 TFRS277B07 Best By 10-20-11
  • Marketside Fresh Spinach 10oz bag 6-81131-32946-0 TFRS277A07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-21-11
  • Marketside Caesar Salad Kit 14.6 oz. bag 6-81131-38744-6 TFRS277B07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-19-11
  • Marketside Asian Salad Kit 15 oz. bag 6-81131-53211-2 TFRS277B07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-19-11
  • Marketside Southwest Salad Kit 15oz bag 6-81131-38747-7 TFRS277B07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-19-11
  • Marketside Premium Romaine 9 oz. bag 6-81131-38753-8 TFRS277B07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-19-11
  • Marketside Premium Romaine Family 18 oz. bag 6-81131-38807-8TFRS277B07 Guaranteed Delicious By 10-19-11
  • Taylor Farms Field Greens 8 oz. bag 0-30223-04036-1 TFRS277B07 Best If Used By 10-20-11

The products were distributed in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Puerto Rico and sold in various retail supermarkets.

No other products or code dates are affected by this recall, and there have been no reported illnesses attributed to the recalled items.

Roman Shades and Roll-Up Blinds "Re-Recall"

October 19, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Recalled - Once again

Today, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Whole Space Industries have voluntary recalled approximately 3,200 units of Roman shades and roll-up blinds, specifically their "Innovations" and "At Home with Meijer" products. The recall has been re-announced as approximately 240,000 units were recalled in March of 2010.

This recall involves previously recalled "Innovations" and "At Home with Meijer" Roman shades and roll-up blinds that were redistributed to stores, and sold after March 2010 without a repair kit. The affected shades contain a label reading "Innovation" or "At Home with Meijer" that can be found under the headrail.

The Roman shades, made with fabric or bamboo, pose a strangulation hazard when a child places his/her neck between the exposed inner cord and the fabric on the backside of the blind. Strangulation can also occur when a child pulls the cord out and wraps it around his/her neck.

The roll-up blinds, made with bamboo, also pose a strangulation hazard, as strangulation can occur if the lifting loops slide off the side of the blind and a child's neck becomes entangled on the free-standing loop, or if a child places his/her neck between the lifting loop and the roll-up blind material.

The products affected by this recall were sold at discount retailers, dollar stores, flea markets and other retail liquidators nationwide, from March 2010 through September 2011. Originally, before being recalled, the products were sold at Meijer stores between January 2004 and December 2009 for about $40.

Consumers should immediately stop using the Roman shades and the roll-up blinds, and contact the Window Covering Safety Council for a free repair kit at (800) 506-4636, or by visiting www.windowcoverings.org. Consumers can also return the products to any Meijer store for a full refund.

It is important to note that no injuries have been reported to date.

Mercedes-Benz Fuel Leak Recall

October 17, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Mercedes-Benz will recall 6,872 diesel-powered cars and SUVs from the 2011 and 2012 model years, to fix a fuel leak. The recall includes 2011 Mercedes E-Class cars, built from July 2010 through February 2011; R-Class crossovers, built from April 2010 through April 2011; ML-Class SUVs, manufactured from January 2010 through March 2011; GL-Class SUVs, built from March 2010 through March 2011; and 2012 2012 S-Class cars (annoyingly, it is still 2011 - there should be a law).

Mercedes-Benz said that the fuel leak problems stem from diesel fuel filters that may leak. Obviously, this poses a risk to the driver and everyone around them. Besides the obvious fire hazard, fuel spill also cause slippery spots on the road that increases the risk of a car accident for the next driver coming down the road.

Under the recall, Mercedes-Benz dealers will inspect the fuel filters and replace the ones that need to be. The recall is expected to begin next month. I never understand why car makers cannot move faster on these recalls. If someone gets hurt between now and then, Mercedes is going to be paying out enough money for somebody to buy their own Mercedes-Benz dealership.

Alabama man awarded $1.5 million for electrical shock

October 17, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
$1.5 Million in Electrical Injury in Alabama

An Alabama jury awarded $1.5 million to a man shocked by low-hanging power lines. The Plaintiff, was paving a road in Alabama when his vehicle struck Black Warrior Electric power lines, sending 7,600 volts of electricity through his right arm.

Suffice to say, that is a lot of electricity, although voltage alone is cause for injury, it is the voltage multiplied by the current. Obviously, his insulation in the vehicle would be important. Still, it has to impact a jury to learn that the guy got shocked by an amount of voltage that is substantially less than the voltage given in the electric chair (about 2000 volts).

Plaintiff's successfully argued at trial that this accident would not have happened if the power company had complied with national codes require that power lines that carry that amount of voltage be placed a certain height above the ground. The jury apparently agreed.

Every year thousands of people are killed or seriously injured because of faulty or defective electrical wiring. Usually, it is just like the facts of this case: a worker on the job that comes into contact with excessive power. Power lines and exposed electrical sources cause too many needless deaths and injuries, injuries that could be avoided if people took public and workplace safety more seriously.


Even MORE Lettuce is Recalled

October 17, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Last week's River Ranch lettuce recall is growing. At that time, their the 8-ounce package of Shredded Iceberg Lettuce was recalled, in addition to several Giant Eagle deli sandwhich rings, as they were prepared with shredded iceburg lettuce, that was potentially contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

River Ranch Fresh Foods has now initiated a voluntary recall of 2,154 cases of various bagged salad products due to the potential of being contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

The bagged salad products subject to the recall include:

  • Farmers Market 8 oz shredded Iceburg 30034-30195 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Farmers Market 7 oz Parisian Blend 30034-30259 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Farmers Market 9 oz Leafy Romaine 30034-30364 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Farmers Market 12 oz Romaine Garden 30034-30220 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Hy-Vee 8 oz Shredded Iceberg 75450-12053 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Hy-Vee 12 oz American Blend 75450-12047 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Hy-Vee 12 oz Garden Supreme 75450-12046 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B
  • Hy-Vee 12 oz Romaine Garden 75450-12058 Best By 14OCT2011 A106A and A106B

These salad products were distributed in Iowa, Ohio, and Pennsylvania and sold in retail supermarkets. No other products or code dates are affected by this recall. As with the previously recalled Iceburg lettuce, there have been no reported illnesses attributed to the recalled items.


CooperVision Recall - Finally

October 16, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

CooperVision has finally done the right thing, and announced a recall of certain lots of Avaira™ Toric contact lenses.

A few days ago, we told you that CooperVision was being urged by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue a recall of their Avaira™ Toric contact lenses, as there were "...a small number of unexpected wearer reports of hazy vision and discomfort." The problem was, CooperVision was minimizing the concerns here in the United States. Limited lots of the lenses were quietly recalled in the U.S. this summer over an unidentified residue....but a broader international notification, which included Hong Kong (the Hong Kong notice states that the lenses were also recalled in Canada, Germany, and Italy), Australia, and Spain, was issued for hundreds of additional lots. The FDA requested that CooperVision make a broader recall which, until now, CooperVision failed to do Now, almost two months after problems were first announced, CooperVision Inc. and federal health regulators have increased public warnings about more than half a million recalled contact lenses, urging users to return the potentially defective products and to seek medical care if they show symptoms of harm.

September 2011 Medication Label Changes

October 14, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
New Medication Label Changes


Last month brought changes to thirty-four (34) medical product labels (down from 45 changes in August), with changes to the prescribing information to include any of the following areas: BOXED WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS, PATIENT PACKAGE INSERT, and MEDICATION GUIDE.

For a complete detailed accounting of the label changes, please refer to the summary of meds. By clicking onto the drug name, you will be able to view the detailed summary, which will identify the safety labeling section and revised subsection, as well as a brief summary of the new or modified safety information.

The following drugs have been effected:

Detrol (tolterodine tartrate) tablets and Detrol LA (tolterodine tartrate) extended release tablets
Orap (pimozide) 1 mg and 2 mg tablets
Anzemet (dolasetron mesylate) tablets and Anzemet (dolasetron mesylate) injection
Atripla (efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets
Avastin (bevacizumab)
Cymbalta (duloxetine hydrochloride)
Effient (prasugrel hydrochloride) 5 mg and 10 mg Tablets
Ellence (epirubicin hydrochloride) injection
Istodax (romidepsin) for Injection
Lexiscan (regadenoson) Injection
MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) injection
Nicorette (nicotine polacrilex) 2 mg and 4mg gum [OTC]
Procardia (nifedipine) 10 mg Capsules
Procardia XL (nifedipine) 30 mg, 60 mg, and 90 mg Extended Release Capsules
Stimate (desmopressin acetate) 1.5 mg/mL nasal spray
Sustenna (paliperidone palmitate) Extended-Release Injectable Suspension for intramuscular use
Risperdal (risperidone) tablets, oral solution
Risperdal M-Tab (risperidone) orally disintegrating tablets
Risperdal Consta (risperidone) long-acting injection
Xenon Xe 133 Gas, 10 and 20 mCi, septum sealed glass vial
Zofran (ondansetron hydrochloride) injection and premixed injection
Zofran (ondansetron hydrochloride) tablets, oral solution, and orally disintegrating tablets

Lettuce Recall

October 14, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
More Lettuce Recalls

Last month, concerns of tainted Romaine lettuce prompted a large recall...this month, Iceburg is the culprit. Listeria monocytogenes continues to be the reason for multiple recalls regarding lettuce.

A random routine sample test of Giant Eagle Farmer's Market shredded Iceberg Lettuce revealed the presences of listeria. The lettuce in question, produced by River Ranch Fresh Foods, is the 8-ounce package of Shredded Iceberg Lettuce, and is imprinted with a use-by date of Oct. 14, 2011.

The shredded iceberg lettuce was additionall used in a small number of prepared deli ring sandwiches. The affected sandwiches include:

  • Giant Eagle Large Italian Sandwich Ring (UPC 23755100000)
  • Giant Eagle Mini Italian Sandwich Ring (UPC 24755500000)
  • Giant Eagle Large New York Sandwich Ring (UPC 22755100000)
  • Giant Eagle Mini New York Sandwich Ring (UPC 25755500000)
  • Giant Eagle Large All America Sandwich Ring (UPC 21755100000)
  • Giant Eagle Mini All American Sandwich Ring (UPC 26755500000)

For all the concern that the tainted lettuce has brought, I have managed to find a silver lining. I finally see a reason for the bonus card key tags. I have always thought that it's ridiculous for stores to require you to be a "loyal shopper" and carry a bonus card, as opposed to offering the reduction to ALL customers, "loyal" or not. But in this case, the cards take on a second meanting. Giant Eagle uses loyalty card purchase history data, to contact customers who may be affected by food recalls. I bought a Lean Cuisine Dinnertime Entree recently from my local grocery store, one that was just the subject of a recall. I didn't receive a call from anybody concerned about my health. Perhaps all stores should take Giant Eagle's lead, and contact customers. It just seems like the right thing to do.

To date, there are no reported cases of customer illness due to consumption of this item.

More Ground Beef Recalls

October 13, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Ground Beef Recall

Ground beef recalls continue this week, as hundreds of thousands of pounds of ground beef have been recalled since last month, due to concerns of E. coli (Escherichia coli) contamination.

This week, over 377,000 pounds of ground beef was recalled from California and Nevada restaurants. Commercial Meat Co., based in Los Angeles, distributed the now recalled ground beef, which was discovered to have tested positive test for E. coli by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) during a routine test.

The following ground beef products are subject to recall:

  • 5,10,15,20,30,40,50 and 60 lb. cases of bulk ground beef
  • 5,10 and 20 lb. cases of ground beef patties
  • 10,15,20,30,40 and 50 lb. cases of ground beef taco
  • 5,10,15,20,25,30,40,50 and 60 lb. cases of ground beef chili

Each case bears a label with the establishment number "EST. 4873" inside the USDA mark of inspection. The products subject to recall were produced between Sept. 7, 2011 and Oct. 6, 2011, and were shipped to restaurants in California and Nevada.

Though there have been no reports of illness associated with this week's recall, Fresco Food Distribution's owner, Al Lemoi, comments that a recall of this magnitude for this company, "could be catastrophic, but for the industry it's a small insignificant amount." Ground beef is particularly susceptible to contamination. Mr. Lemoi explained that E. coli is topical, but because ground beef is grinded, bacteria can easily spread across the entire food product.

Continue reading " More Ground Beef Recalls " »

Kroger Ice Cream Recall - Peanuts

October 13, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Kroger Ice Cream Recall

Kroger Co., the nation's largest grocery store operator, is recalling a specific lot of "Extreme Moose Tracks" ice cream sold in 10 states, as it may contain peanuts not mentioned on the label.

The recall involves only their 16-ounce pints of the product, ones that list a sell-by date of June 18, 2012, and contain the UPC code 11110 52909.

The ice cream was sold at Kroger stores in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee, as well as the company's Jay C, Food 4 Less, Owen's, Pay Less and Scott's stores in Illinois and Indiana. Kroger says shoppers should return the product to supermarkets for a refund or replacement. If 1% of the people who bought the ice cream do this, I would be shocked. It is like a "can I help?" when you know the person you are asking is going to say no. Still, the offer is the right thing to do, of course. (If they didn't, I would be complaining about that, too, so I realize they can't win. Then again, don't put peanuts in your product without telling us and you won't be in the situation in the first place.)

Last month, an E. coli outbreak prompted a ground beef recall by Tyson Fresh Meats, which involved certain Kroger-brand ground beef.

Brewer’s Yeast Tablet Recall

October 13, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

NOW Foods is voluntarily recalling selected lots of its Brewer’s Yeast Tablets due to the presence of an undeclared milk alergen. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products, and should stop taking them immediately. The presence of a milk allergen was discovered during an FDA inspection of NOW’s supplier of Brewer’s Yeast tablets, and was confirmed through allergen testing by NOW. No illnesses or adverse events have been reported to date.

The recall covers Brewer’s Yeast tablets, 10 grain, 650 mg, in bottle sizes:

  • 200 tablets - product code 2410
  • 500 tablets - product code 2412

These products were distributed throughout the United States and other countries. The affected U.S. lot numbers for product 2410 are:

  • 1334119
  • 1354098
  • 1362375

The affected U.S. lot numbers for product 2412 are:

  • 1347607
  • 1334773
  • 1358774

The product code is located on the label and the lot number is located on the bottom of the package. These lots were produced between March and June 2011.

All other NOW Foods products, including Brewer’s Yeast product code 2420, are not affected and are not involved in this recall.

LEAN CUISINE Recall

October 12, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Lean Cuisine Chicken Fettuccini Recall

Nestlé will recall one of my favorites, LEAN CUISINE® Dinnertime Selects™ Chicken Fettuccini. A small quantity, less than 200 packages, was inadvertently packaged with the product, Lemon Garlic Shrimp. The affected product is marked with a production code of 1253595911G and has a “best before” date of October 2012. It is believed that the incorrectly packaged product was shipped to grocers in Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Oregon and Washington State.

No illnesses or allergic reactions have been reported, but in an abundance of caution, Nestlé recalled of an entire hour code of production to ensure the safety of consumers. Because the mislabeled product contains shrimp, an allergen, Nestlé is strongly advising consumers who are allergic to shellfish and who have purchased the recalled product not to consume it to avoid the possibility of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction. Nestlé was alerted to this issue by four consumers who purchased the mislabeled product.

Consumers may contact Nestlé for a full refund by calling Consumer Services directly at 1-800-542-6935.

Recalls - Jogging Strollers, Pool Pumps & PatioGlo Bio-Fuel Gel

October 12, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Recall of Almost a Half Million Strollers

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and B.O.B. Trailers, Inc. has announced a voluntary recall of B.O.B. single and double strollers, as the canopy drawstring can pose a strangulation hazard.

Approximately 438,700 strollers in the United States and Canada have been recalled, as well as a previous recall of 357,000 units in February 2011, due to the strangulation hazard.

There have been six reported incidents of children mouthing the detached patch, with gagging and choking having been reported in two of the incidents. In each of the reported incidents, the children were seated in an infant car seat attached to the stroller.

This recall involves all B.O.B. strollers manufactured between November 1998 and November 2010. Strollers manufactured after October 2006 have a white label affixed to the back of the stroller's leg with the manufacturing date. Strollers with no manufacturing date listed were produced prior to October 2006, and are included in this recall. The strollers were sold in single seat and double-seat models. The BOB®, Ironman® or Stroller Strides® brand name is embroidered on the canopy of the strollers. The affected strollers were sold nationwide at REI, Babies R' Us and other children's product and sporting goods stores, as well as Amazon.com. These strollers were sold between November 1998 and October 2011, and retailed between $280 and $600.

Consumers are instructed to immediately stop using the recalled strollers until they have removed the embroidery backing patch from the interior of the canopy's logo.

Another recall announced today are pool pump motors, manufactured by Nidec Motor Corporation. The product affected by this recall is the Ecotech EZ® Variable Speed pool pump motors, as they are not properly grounded, and pose a potential electrical shock hazard.

Continue reading " Recalls - Jogging Strollers, Pool Pumps & PatioGlo Bio-Fuel Gel " »

Sony TV Recall: 1.6 Million May Catch Fire

October 12, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Sony's reputation is taking a hit with recent recalls

Sony Corp. will recall 1.6 million Bravia flat-panel TVs after learning that a faulty component on these Sony televisions may cause them to melt and/or catch fire.

There have been eleven incidents of melting or fire reported to Sony. None have caused injury. Sony did not indicate whether they have any reports of significant property damage.

What is the problem with these televisions? It appears that a faulty component in the backlight systems may cause overheating, melting the top of the television.

Sony is struggling with a lot of recalls. Most are not the type of things that are on the radar of a product liability lawyer, they are mostly just defective products that don't work or don't work as they should.

The company also recalled 535,000 Vaio computers because of concerns of overheating from a temperature control defect.

Continue reading " Sony TV Recall: 1.6 Million May Catch Fire " »

Corvette Recall

October 11, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

GM will recall approximately 5,800 2011–12 Chevrolet Corvette coupes. Apparently, the rear hatch on this sports car may fly off in a car accident. GM says the rear hinges on the Corvette were not strong enough to meet the federal safety standard for door locks and door-retention components. Specifically, the loose hatch increases the risk of an unbelted occupant being thrown from a vehicle during a crash.

GM says it uncovered this defect in these new Corvettes after a supplier was testing the product in Europe. Did they sneak by the Americans without notice? Anyway, GM's investigation found the defective hinges all came from a single roll of heat-treated steel.

.

CooperVision Recall a Bit Hazy?

October 11, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

In August of this year, CooperVision, very quietly, issued a voluntary recall of a "limited lot" of their Avaira Toric contact lenses. According to their website announcement, "...a small number of unexpected wearer reports of hazy vision and discomfort. The wearer symptoms were temporary in many cases." Now, with growing reports of eye problems, federal health officials are threatening to issue a public warning about the recalled lenses.

The lenses, manufactured by CooperVision Inc. and sold at stores such as Costco, Wal-Mart, and LensCrafters, have led to complaints ranging from blurry vision, all the way to agonizing pain requiring emergency room visits in some cases. Approximately one dozen customers have come forward so far to report their concerns... and their pain.

On Virginia man said his 15-year-old daughter was in so much pain after wearing her Avaira Torics—from a newly opened box he purchased at Wal-Mart—she was rushed to the hospital.“ I noticed what first looked like a torn piece of contact on her eye…. " The girl was diagnosed with a severe corneal tear and was treated with pain and antibiotic medications; her parents only learned of the recall after the girl suffered eye injury.

Continue reading " CooperVision Recall a Bit Hazy? " »

Tamoxifen and Diabetes

October 11, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.


Researchers have uncovered a link between breast cancer treatment and type 2 diabetes. According to a study conducted by The University of Toronto, it has been discovered that therapy with the drug Tamoxifen has been linked to a significant increase in the development of diabetes in older survivors of breast cancer.

Tamoxifen, an oral medication used in women with breast cancer, is one of the most widely prescribed drugs to prevent a recurrence in women who have been treated for the condition. Tamoxifen disrupts the female body’s production of estrogen, which is known to promote breast cancer in women. Research now suggests that the drug may contribute to an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Researchers state that no one taking Tamoxifen should discontinue their use of the medication, but they and their doctors should be aware of the association.

For the study, the researchers examined the medical records of 14,360 women over the age of 65 who had been diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, and had survived. The results, which were published in the journal "Cancer", showed that Tamoxifen patients are 25 percent more likely to develop type 2 diabetes.

Tamoxifen therapy is known to be associated with several serious side effects, including strokes, blood clots, uterine cancer, and cataracts. It is also thought to cause symptoms similar to menopause such as hot flashes, irregular menstrual periods, headaches, nausea, and fatigue. Though Tamoxifen therapy does cause blood clots or stroke in a small number of women, the chances of developing such complications are similar to those associated with estrogen replacement therapy.

Tamoxifen unquestionably has it upsides. Tamoxifen therapy improves bone health, by inhibiting osteoclasts and preventing osteoporosis. The question for Tamoxifen users is simple. They have enough health problems as it is. So they want to understand the risk of Tamoxifen and the extent of that risk. With this information, patients and their doctors can choose what medication is best for them.

Sprycel Update

October 11, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program is reporting a new concern with the drug, Sprycel (dasatinib). The FDA is notifying healthcare professionals that Sprycel may increase the risk of a rare but serious condition in which there is abnormally high blood pressure in the arteries of the lungs (pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH]). Symptoms of PAH may include shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling of the body in areas such as the ankles and legs.

According to the reported cases, patients developed PAH after starting Sprycel, including after more than one year of treatment. Information about this risk has been added to the Warnings and Precautions section of the Sprycel drug label.

Sprycel (dasatinib) is being used to treat certain adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The FDA is recommending that healthcare professionals evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of underlying cardiopulmonary disease PRIOR to starting Sprycel, and also during treatment. If PAH is confirmed, Sprycel should be permanently discontinued.

IKEA Folding Tent Recall

October 10, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

There is a recall for BUSA children's folding tents, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada. There are about 58,000 folding tents - 51,000 in the United States - involved in the recall.

This recall involves a cube-shaped children’s folding tent with model number 90192009. The brand name BUSA and IKEA, where the tents were exclusively sold, apparently. The model number are printed on a sewn-in label attached to an interior seam in the folding tent. The tent frame is made of flat steel wire and the tent material is pale green polyester fabric with turquoise, pink and white trim.

The problem with these Vietnamese made folding tents is that the steel wire frame of the tent can break, producing sharp wire ends that can protrude through the tent fabric, posing a laceration or puncture hazard.

No injuries have been reported. I'm not sure what brought this defect to IKEA's or the USCP's attention.

Recalled Protein Products, Cereal Bars, and Soy Flour

October 7, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

More recalls this week of note:

Flowers Foods is voluntarily recalling the following Mrs. Freshley’s multipack cereal bars, as they may contain undeclared non-fat dry milk:

  • Mrs. Freshley’s Canadian Label Apple Cinnamon Fruit & Pastry Cereal Bars, UPC 072250002400
  • Mrs. Freshley’s Canadian Label Blueberry Fruit and Pastry Cereal Bars, UPC 072250002387
  • Mrs. Freshley’s Canadian Label Strawberry Fruit and Pastry Cereal Bars, UPC 072250002363
The recalled product involves the following distribution:
  • In Canada: To food and convenience stores in Quebec and Ontario provinces
  • In U.S: To discount stores nationwide in the dual-language (French/English) multipack carton

People who have allergies to dairy products run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products. The recall was initiated after Flowers discovered that product containing non-fat dry milk was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of milk, and that product labeled for sale and distribution in Canada was sold for distribution in the U.S.

Another recall this week involving undeclared milk is Prolab Nutrition. Prolab is recalling some of its protein items as they too, may contain undeclared milk, as well as possible undeclared heat and gluten allergens. People with an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk and/or wheat and gluten allergens may run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume products containing these allergens. Although no illness have been reported, Prolab is recalling the following:

Item Description: EAN/UPC - Contains Undeclared MILK and WHEAT/GLUTEN

  • PROLAB® Pure Whey3, Milk Chocolate, 5 lb. (V3) 750902201929
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Vanilla Créme, 2 lb. (V3) 750902201875
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Wild Strawberry, 5 lb. (V3) 750902201936
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Wild Strawberry, 2 lb. (V3) 750902101557

Contains Undeclared WHEAT/GLUTEN

  • PROLAB® Advanced Pure Whey Protein4, Milk Chocolate, 2 lb. (V3)750902201301
  • PROLAB® Advanced Pure Whey Protein, Vanilla Créme, 2 lb. (V3) 750902201349
  • PROLAB® Advanced Pure Whey Protein, Wild Strawberry, 2 lb. (V3) 750902201271
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey5, Milk Chocolate, 2 lb. (V3)
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Milk Chocolate, 16 g Sample Packet 750902201882
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Vanilla Créme, 5 lb. (V3)
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Vanilla Créme, 16 g Sample Packet 750902201912
  • PROLAB® Pure Whey, Wild Strawberry, 16 g Sample Packet
  • PROLAB® Whey Isolate Protein6, Milk Chocolate, 2 lb. (V3) 750902201851
  • PROLAB® Whey Isolate Protein, Vanilla Créme, 2 lb. (V3)50902201813
  • PROLAB® Whey Isolate Protein, Wild Strawberry, 2 lb. (V3) 750902201837

Continue reading " Recalled Protein Products, Cereal Bars, and Soy Flour " »

Cantaloupe Recalls Continue - Fresh Up

October 7, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

More recalls are reported today, as Fresh Up, Inc. recalls approximately 4,800 individual packages of fresh cut cantaloupe and cut mixed fruit containing cantaloupe. As has been the case since August, the recalled product has the potential to be contaminated with listeria monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems.

The fresh cut fruit subject to this recall was sold between August 31, 2011 and September 11, 2011, and consisted of the following products: Cantaloupe Chunks, Cantaloupe Slices, Gourmet Fruit Salad, Small Fruit Salad, Small and Large Fruit Salad with Pineapple, Fruit Salad with Kiwi, and Fruit Trays. The packaging has "best-if-used-by" dates ranging from September 4th through September 11th.

It is important to note that no illnesses have been reported to date in connection with the cantaloupe processed by Fruit Fresh Up, but they are recalling these products in an abundance of caution. The reports of illnesses, stemming from cantaloupes sold by Jensen Farms, continue to rise. As of Wednesday, October 5th, there were a total of 96 illnesses, including 18 deaths. Jenson Farms has ceased production and distribution of the product while the FDA and the company continue their investigations as to what caused the problem.

Uprizing 2.0 Recalled

October 6, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Superior Metabolic Technologies, Inc. is voluntarily recalling all lots of the testosterone booster Uprizing 2.0, as tests have shown that the product appears to contain superdrol. Superdrol is a synthetic steroid, making it an unapproved new drug. The FDA informed Superior Metabolic Technologies that Uprizing 2.0 contains superdrol, which is banned by the FDA, leading to the recall of the product.

Use of synthetic anabolic steroids has been known to lead. Additionally, use of synthetic anabolic steroids may cause other serious long-term adverse health consequences in men, women, and children. Side affects include shrinkage of the testes and male infertility, masculinization of women, breast enlargement in males, short stature in children, a higher prediction to misuse other drugs and alcohol, adverse effects on blood lipid levels, and increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death.

Uprizing 2.0 comes in a black plastic bottle with a black, red, and silver label and contains 90 capsules. The SMT logo is center top on the bottle. Uprizing 2.0 was distributed through retail health food stores in Alabama, Arizona, California, Georgia, Mississippi, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Texas.

More Stool Recalls

October 5, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Ballard Designs have issued an immediate recall of "Stafford" step stools. It has been reported that the plastic tabs on the feet of the step stools can cause the stools to be unstable, posing a fall hazard. To date, there have been two reports of falls, with minor injuries.

This recall affects the "Stafford" step stools, ones that are made of wood and painted black or white. The stools, made in China, have a "Ballard Designs" sticker on the bottom. Also printed on the underside bottom of the step stools is one of the following five numbers:

  • 100097963
  • 100099019
  • 100097230
  • 100100584
  • 100102942

All recalled stools also have four plastic tabs affixed to the feet of the step stool. Consumers should immediately remove the four plastic tabs from the feet of their step stools.

A few months ago, we told you of two recalls, affecting almost 550,000 step stools. These stools, while sold in Target stores, were made in China as well. This recall affects approximately 2,500 stools, the last, over 550,000. That's a WHOLE LOT of stools that can't be stood on which, arguably, is the purpose of a stool in the first place.

Multiple Bone Fractures

October 4, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

More Information

Stating the obvious, multiple fracture personal injury claims tend to be serious cases. Jury Verdict Research did a study looking at multiple fracture cases

What is the take home message? I guess it is that there are a lot of different ways to be very seriously injured. By the way, this data is almost 10 years old. But I doubt much has changed in terms of how these accidents happen.

Sample IME Cross Examination

October 4, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This Maryland Accident Lawyer blog post provides a sample cross examination of an expert that provides a good example of what you do with IME doctors that have a history of testifying for insurance companies.

Kraft Velveeta Shells and Cheese

October 4, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Kraft Foods has voluntarily recalled 137,000 Velveeta Shells and Cheese Microwaveable Cups, as they may contain small, thin wire bristle pieces. There affected products vary.

There have been no reports of injury, but Kraft has made the recall in an abundance of caution.
Customers should return the products to the store of purchase for an exchange or full refund.

Kraft has found themselves in litigation in the recent past...though not always for recalled food products. In 2007, Kraft ran into problems associated with misrepresentation. In response to lawsuits, Kraft agreed to change the labeling on its guacamole dip to “guacamole flavor” after it was revealed that the guacamole "dip" contained less than 2% avocado. They were also forced to remove the “all natural” tag from their Capri Sun product as it was found to contain "not so natural" ingredients such as high-fructose corn syrup.

Prior to this, in 2006, lawsuits against Kraft were dismissed after Kraft changed its formula for Crystal Light Sunrise Orange and Kool-Aid Jammers. Lawsuits had been filed alleging soft drinks made by Kraft Foods may contain the cancer causing chemical, benzene. We are not handling these cases and cannot speak to the merits of the lawsuits.

Risk of Falling Furniture

October 2, 2011, by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

The CPSC wants to underscore to all ol of us the hazzards of falling furniture, a problem few Americans spend much time worrying about. To do so, it relives a haunting tragedy of an 11 month old infant who died died while watching TV with his father. The child's older (2 years-old) brother bumped into the furniture holding the TV and the TV fell onto the baby's head and abdomen. In another tragic case, a little three year-old girl died from falling furniture in the garage last month.

Between 8,000 and 10,000 people are injured each year. During the first decade of this century, the CPSC received reports of 245 tip-over-related deaths involving children 8 years old and younger. It is an incredible statistic. Imagine 245 dead kids over something you probably have never given two thoughts. Crazy. More than 90 percent of the incidents involved children 5 years old and younger. In more than half of the 245 fatalities (56%), the child was crushed by the weight of the television, furniture, or appliance. The majority of the fatalities are from falling televisions and two-thirds of fatal injuries are, not suprisingly, to the head.

The solution is simple: inspect and anchor furniture and TVs now, in order to protect young children from a preventable tragedy.